CVE-2024-6119High· 7.5▾ TwilightIssue summary: Applications performing certificate name checks (e.g., TLS clients checking server certificates) may attempt to read an invalid memory address resulting in abnormal termination of the application process. Impact summary: …
▾ Twilight zone — High severity, or a signal on a lesser flaw
impact 41.3 · likelihood 13.3 · exploitation 0
Need a working PoC? Pro members can cast a request and our team develops one — it lands right here.
Stakeholder-Specific Vulnerability Categorization from CISA's ADP record at CVE.org: whether exploitation is observed, whether an attack can be automated, and how much of the system is at stake. The CVSS score shown above comes from the CISA ADP record, not NVD.
Exploit-prediction probability, daily snapshots since Oct 15.
Disclosure to exploitation, from the record and what we observed since indexing it.
Disclosed via CVEORG
Last analysed / modified upstream
67%
Issue summary: Applications performing certificate name checks (e.g., TLS clients checking server certificates) may attempt to read an invalid memory address resulting in abnormal termination of the application process.
Impact summary: Abnormal termination of an application can a cause a denial of service.
Applications performing certificate name checks (e.g., TLS clients checking
server certificates) may attempt to read an invalid memory address when
comparing the expected name with an otherName subject alternative name of an
X.509 certificate. This may result in an exception that terminates the
application program.
Note that basic certificate chain validation (signatures, dates, ...) is not affected, the denial of service can occur only when the application also specifies an expected DNS name, Email address or IP address.
TLS servers rarely solicit client certificates, and even when they do, they generally don't perform a name check against a reference identifier (expected identity), but rather extract the presented identity after checking the certificate chain. So TLS servers are generally not affected and the severity of the issue is Moderate.
The FIPS modules in 3.3, 3.2, 3.1 and 3.0 are not affected by this issue.
OpenSSL >= 3.3.0 < 3.3.2OpenSSL >= 3.2.0 < 3.2.3OpenSSL >= 3.1.0 < 3.1.7OpenSSL >= 3.0.0 < 3.0.15Refer to the linked advisories for vendor-supplied fixes and affected version ranges.
Connected by shared product, vendor, weakness, or advisory.
CVE-2023-0286High· 7.4There is a type confusion vulnerability relating to X.400 address processing inside an X.509 GeneralName
CVE-2018-0737Medium· 5.9The OpenSSL RSA Key generation algorithm has been shown to be vulnerable to a cache timing side channel attack
CVE-2025-68160Medium· 4.7Heap out-of-bounds write in BIO_f_linebuffer on short writes
CVE-2025-69419High· 7.4Out of bounds write in PKCS12_get_friendlyname() UTF-8 conversion
CVE-2025-69420High· 7.5Missing ASN1_TYPE validation in TS_RESP_verify_response() function
CVE-2025-69421High· 7.5NULL Pointer Dereference in PKCS12_item_decrypt_d2i_ex function