CVE-2025-37889None▾ SunlitIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: ASoC: ops: Consistently treat platform_max as control value This reverts commit 9bdd10d57a88 ("ASoC: ops: Shift tested values in snd_soc_put_volsw() by +min"), and mak…
▾ Sunlit zone — Low / medium · no exploitation signal
impact 2.8 · likelihood 0.1 · exploitation 0
Need a working PoC? Pro members can cast a request and our team develops one — it lands right here.
Stakeholder-Specific Vulnerability Categorization from CISA's ADP record at CVE.org: whether exploitation is observed, whether an attack can be automated, and how much of the system is at stake.
Exploit-prediction probability, daily snapshots since Nov 5.
Disclosure to exploitation, from the record and what we observed since indexing it.
Disclosed via CVEORG
Last analysed / modified upstream
0.3%
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
ASoC: ops: Consistently treat platform_max as control value
This reverts commit 9bdd10d57a88 ("ASoC: ops: Shift tested values in snd_soc_put_volsw() by +min"), and makes some additional related updates.
There are two ways the platform_max could be interpreted; the maximum register value, or the maximum value the control can be set to. The patch moved from treating the value as a control value to a register one. When the patch was applied it was technically correct as snd_soc_limit_volume() also used the register interpretation. However, even then most of the other usages treated platform_max as a control value, and snd_soc_limit_volume() has since been updated to also do so in commit fb9ad24485087 ("ASoC: ops: add correct range check for limiting volume"). That patch however, missed updating snd_soc_put_volsw() back to the control interpretation, and fixing snd_soc_info_volsw_range(). The control interpretation makes more sense as limiting is typically done from the machine driver, so it is appropriate to use the customer facing representation rather than the internal codec representation. Update all the code to consistently use this interpretation of platform_max.
Finally, also add some comments to the soc_mixer_control struct to hopefully avoid further patches switching between the two approaches.
Linux >= c11fc224e58e7972ffd05b8f25e9b1d6a0b8d562 < c402f184a053c8e7ca325e50f04bbbc1e4fee019Linux >= a50562146d6c7650029a115c96ef9aaa7648c344 < 694110bc2407a61f02a770cbb5f39b51e4ec77c6Linux >= 395e52b7a1ad01e1b51adb09854a0aa5347428de < 544055329560d4b64fe204fc6be325ebc24c72caLinux >= fb9ad24485087e0f00d84bee7a5914640b2b9024 < a46a9371f8b9a0eeff53a21e11ed3b65f52d9cf6Linux >= fb9ad24485087e0f00d84bee7a5914640b2b9024 < 296c8295ae34045da0214882628d49c1c060dd8aLinux >= fb9ad24485087e0f00d84bee7a5914640b2b9024 < 0eba2a7e858907a746ba69cd002eb9eb4dbd7bf3Linux >= 5.15.148 < 5.15.180Linux >= 6.1.74 < 6.1.132Linux >= 6.6.7 < 6.6.84Linux 6.7Refer to the linked advisories for vendor-supplied fixes and affected version ranges.
Connected by shared product, vendor, weakness, or advisory.
CVE-2026-99284Nonenet: skbuff: propagate shared-frag marker in skb_zerocopy()
CVE-2026-99283Nonenetfilter: conntrack: tcp: use UNACK timeout for non-closing RST packets
CVE-2026-99272Nonesmb: client: validate the data area in SMB2_read()
CVE-2026-99271NoneALSA: line6: Clear prev_fbuf on capture buffer release
CVE-2026-99273Noneksmbd: reserve space for the UTF-16 terminator in stream info
CVE-2026-99275Nonesmb: client: reject short SESSION_SETUP responses