CVE-2026-101028Medium· 6.5▾ TwilightPoC availableIncorrect Authorization vulnerability in ash-project ash allows an actor to infer data in related records they cannot read via Ash.count/2, Ash.exists/2 and Ash.aggregate/3. Ash.Actions.Aggregate.run/4 (lib/ash/actions/aggregate.ex) app…
▾ Twilight zone — High severity, or a signal on a lesser flaw
impact 35.8 · likelihood 0.1 · exploitation 12
A public proof-of-concept already exists for this vulnerability — see Exploit availability below.
Stakeholder-Specific Vulnerability Categorization from CISA's ADP record at CVE.org: whether exploitation is observed, whether an attack can be automated, and how much of the system is at stake. The CVSS score shown above comes from the vendor's CSAF advisory record, not NVD.
Exploit-prediction probability, daily snapshots since Oct 9.
Disclosure to exploitation, from the record and what we observed since indexing it.
Disclosed via NVD
0.3%
— → 6.5
none → medium
Exploit / PoC code exists
0.3% → 0.3%
Incorrect Authorization vulnerability in ash-project ash allows an actor to infer data in related records they cannot read via Ash.count/2, Ash.exists/2 and Ash.aggregate/3.
Ash.Actions.Aggregate.run/4 (lib/ash/actions/aggregate.ex) applied only the root resource's read policy before running the aggregate query. The read path also applies each related resource's read policy to filter and sort references that cross a relationship, directly (for example comments.body) or through an aggregate over one, but the aggregate path skipped that step. A caller whose filter or sort reaches these functions, for example through Ash.Query.filter_input/2, an ash_lua script, or an AshAi tool offering count or exists results, can test conditions against related rows hidden from them and recover their existence and attribute values one query at a time. Ash.read/2 and its page counts are not affected.
This issue affects ash: from 2.6.0 before 3.34.6.
Refer to the linked advisories for vendor-supplied fixes and affected version ranges.
Field changes observed since this record was first indexed.
Connected by shared product, vendor, weakness, or advisory.
CVE-2026-114214Medium· 6.0Loading a through relationship with a limit of 1 in Ash ignores the through path and returns unrelated destination records
CVE-2026-96581High· 7.6An upsert on the primary key in Ash ignores attribute multitenancy, so one tenant can read, overwrite and take over another tenant's records
CVE-2026-116140Low· 3.3ImageMagick: ImageMagick: Security policy bypass via flawed delegate invocation parsing (CVE-2026-116140)
CVE-2026-115221Medium· 5.4Ipa: freeipa: freeipa uses subject cn as proof of certificate ownership
CVE-2026-115365Medium· 6.6github.com/openbao/openbao: OpenBao: Privilege escalation via ACL policy cache namespace traversal (CVE-2026-115365)
CVE-2026-94201High· 8.2Ash stores :atom-typed attributes as strings and compares them as strings