CVE-2026-99059High· 7.7▾ TwilightIn the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: wireguard: noise: reject response consumption after intermediate initiation Two threads begin processing the identical response message, received twice. The first thre…
▾ Twilight zone — High severity, or a signal on a lesser flaw
impact 42.4 · likelihood 0.1 · exploitation 0
Need a working PoC? Pro members can cast a request and our team develops one — it lands right here.
Exploit-prediction probability, daily snapshots since Oct 24.
Disclosure to exploitation, from the record and what we observed since indexing it.
Disclosed via CVEORG
Last analysed / modified upstream
0.2%
— → 7.7
none → high
0.2% → 0.4%
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
wireguard: noise: reject response consumption after intermediate initiation
Two threads begin processing the identical response message, received twice. The first thread, A, runs. While it's running, the second one, B, gets partway through, and during that slow calculation, or even while blocking on down_write(), A completes and then also a handshake initiation that's already been queued up runs in thread C, which itself takes that same down_write(). The handshake initiation creation succeeds, and sets the state back to waiting-for-response, and calls up_write(), at which point thread B resumes, because either its finished its calculations or was finally allowed to acquire down_write(). Thread B then copies the state back to the peer, and begins a new session, using that state, which is the same session as the one made in thread A.
Thread A Thread B Thread C
down_read() sA = handshake->state memcpy(cA, handshake->crypto) up_read() if (sA != 1) goto fail slow_crypto(cA) down_read() sB = handshake->state memcpy(cB, handshake->crypto) up_read() if (sB != 1) goto fail slow_crypto(cB) down_write() if (sA != handshake->state) goto fail memcpy(handshake->crypto, cA) handshake->state = 2 up_write() down_write() if (handshake->state != 2) goto fail derive_session(handshake->crypto) up_write() down_write() slow_crypto(handshake->crypto) handshake->state = 1 up_write() down_write() if (sB != handshake->state) goto fail memcpy(handshake->crypto, cB) handshake->state = 2 up_write() down_write() if (handshake->state != 2) goto fail derive_session(handshake->crypto) up_write()
This seems basically impossible to hit in a meaningful way in practice, but ensure that it absolutely cannot happen by comparing the ephemeral private key that's on the stack with the latest one that the peer's handshake state has.
Linux >= e7096c131e5161fa3b8e52a650d7719d2857adfd < fb5ce4c7790c3eeec820302d08d70ecf46af4295Linux >= e7096c131e5161fa3b8e52a650d7719d2857adfd < c76a80db593096edf2b3b3972f58b6342a8c6c04Linux >= e7096c131e5161fa3b8e52a650d7719d2857adfd < 4d64a3d6e96aa78619c9c29ffde309794974588aLinux >= e7096c131e5161fa3b8e52a650d7719d2857adfd < 3bec3d32c2a3afd164fc87f95457df2cf9049c20Linux >= e7096c131e5161fa3b8e52a650d7719d2857adfd < d0305f8d90029556260c6824b61c493c424eba9eLinux 5.6Refer to the linked advisories for vendor-supplied fixes and affected version ranges.
Field changes observed since this record was first indexed.
Connected by shared product, vendor, weakness, or advisory.
CVE-2026-99100Nonewifi: p54: validate firmware record lengths
CVE-2024-38564High· 7.8bpf: Add BPF_PROG_TYPE_CGROUP_SKB attach type enforcement in BPF_LINK_CREATE
CVE-2026-99092Noneriscv: patch: fix handling of bpf-jit execmem addresses
CVE-2026-99089NoneASoC: samsung: i2s: enable op_clk in probe to balance runtime PM
CVE-2026-99093Nonemm: don't schedule deferred kernel page table freeing while booting
CVE-2026-99088Nonenet: openvswitch: validate transport header presence in set_ipv6_addr