IBM has 814 CVEs on record between 2024 and 2026. Disclosure cadence is accelerating: 667 in the last 90 days against 45 in the 90 before. The busiest recent month was September 2026 with 364. The median CVSS is 7.1 (high), with 84 rated critical. 0% have been exploited in the wild, in line with the corpus average. The dominant weakness classes are CWE-79 (53) and CWE-78 (52). Most affected products: guardium_data_protection (77), i (52), datastage_on_cloud_pak_for_data (51).
CVEs per month
Last 12 months, by publish date
- Exploited share
- 0% vs 1% corpus
- Median CVSS
- 7.1
- Publish → KEV
- —
- Last 90 days
- 667 prev 45
Weakness classes
Products
- guardium_data_protection 77
- i 52
- datastage_on_cloud_pak_for_data 51
- financial_transaction_manager 46
- datapower_gateway 42
- Langflow OSS 40
Worst active — by depth score
CVE-2026-107329Critical· 9.9Langflow OSS is affected by multiple vulnerabilities67CVE-2026-107328Critical· 9.9Langflow OSS is affected by multiple vulnerabilities67CVE-2026-107327Critical· 9.9Langflow OSS is affected by multiple vulnerabilities67CVE-2026-85542High· 8.8IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2 is affected by a command injection vulnerability in the GIM bundle import functionality67CVE-2026-93680Critical· 9.8Langflow OSS is affected by multiple vulnerabilities66
IBM vulnerabilities
CVEs affecting IBM, newest first. Open any entry for full detail, references, and exploit status.
814 CVEsRSS
CVE-2026-11710Medium· 6.5IBM WebSphere Application Server 8.5 is affected by an HTTP request smuggling vulnerability due to improper handling of Content-Length headers.
IBM WebSphere Application Server 8.5 is affected by an HTTP request smuggling vulnerability due to improper handling of Content-Length headers.
CVE-2026-11722Medium· 4.8IBM WebSphere Application Server and WebSphere Application Server Liberty are affected by an HTTP request smuggling vulnerability.
IBM WebSphere Application Server and WebSphere Application Server Liberty are affected by an HTTP request smuggling vulnerability.
CVE-2026-11716High· 7.5IBM MQ for HPE NonStop 8.1.0 through 8.1.0.40 could allow an authenticated attacker to cause a denial of service or potentially execute arbitrary code during queue manager startup due to improper validation of cluster migration data.
IBM MQ for HPE NonStop 8.1.0 through 8.1.0.40 could allow an authenticated attacker to cause a denial of service or potentially execute arbitrary code during queue manager startup due to improper validation of cluster migration data.
CVE-2026-11726High· 8.1IBM MQ for HPE NonStop 8.1.0 through 8.1.0.40 could allow an authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information or cause a denial of service due to improper validation of message header offset values.
IBM MQ for HPE NonStop 8.1.0 through 8.1.0.40 could allow an authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information or cause a denial of service due to improper validation of message header offset values.
CVE-2026-11727High· 8.1IBM MQ for HPE NonStop 8.1.0 through 8.1.0.40 IBM MQ C client could allow a remote attacker to cause a denial of service or potentially execute arbitrary code due to improper validation of queue manager responses when requesting AMS poli…
IBM MQ for HPE NonStop 8.1.0 through 8.1.0.40 IBM MQ C client could allow a remote attacker to cause a denial of service or potentially execute arbitrary code due to improper validation of queue manager responses when requesting AMS poli…
CVE-2026-17619High· 8.6IBM Platform RTM is vulnerable to SQL injection
IBM Platform RTM is vulnerable to SQL injection. A remote attacker could send specially crafted SQL statements, which could allow the attacker to view, add, modify, or delete information in the back-end database.
CVE-2026-17262Medium· 5.4IBM i 7.6, 7.5, 7.4, and 7.3 could allow a local attacker to cause a denial of service due to improper validation of FTP authentication commands.
IBM i 7.6, 7.5, 7.4, and 7.3 could allow a local attacker to cause a denial of service due to improper validation of FTP authentication commands.
CVE-2026-80441Critical· 9.8IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2 is vulnerable to an unauthenticated second-order SQL injection vulnerability in the generateInsertQuery functionality of change-tracker-data.sql
IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2 is vulnerable to an unauthenticated second-order SQL injection vulnerability in the generateInsertQuery functionality of change-tracker-data.sql. A remote attacker could inject malicious SQL that is subs…
CVE-2026-75878Critical· 9.1IBM Sterling File Gateway could allow a remote attacker to bypass authentication and obtain a fully authenticated session due to improper authentication via an unvalidated SSO header.
IBM Sterling File Gateway could allow a remote attacker to bypass authentication and obtain a fully authenticated session due to improper authentication via an unvalidated SSO header.
CVE-2026-81656High· 8.8IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2 is vulnerable to a SQL injection vulnerability in the New Query Builder REST Processor
IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2 is vulnerable to a SQL injection vulnerability in the New Query Builder REST Processor. A low-privileged authenticated user can inject SQL statements through the newQueryBuilder REST endpoint, potentiall…
CVE-2026-81623Medium· 6.3IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2 could allow an authenticated user to execute arbitrary commands with low user privileges on the system due to improper validation of user supplied input.
IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2 could allow an authenticated user to execute arbitrary commands with low user privileges on the system due to improper validation of user supplied input.
CVE-2026-80442Critical· 9.9IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2 is vulnerable to an authenticated OS command injection vulnerability in the exportCertificate functionality
IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2 is vulnerable to an authenticated OS command injection vulnerability in the exportCertificate functionality. Successful exploitation could allow an attacker to execute unauthorized commands and impact th…
CVE-2026-82887High· 8.8IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary commands due to improper neutralization of special elements used in an OS command.
IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary commands due to improper neutralization of special elements used in an OS command.
CVE-2026-81657Critical· 9.8IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2 could allow a remote unauthenticated attacker to execute arbitrary code on the system due to the deserialization of untrusted data.
IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2 could allow a remote unauthenticated attacker to execute arbitrary code on the system due to the deserialization of untrusted data.
CVE-2026-82890Medium· 5.9IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary JavaScript code due to improper neutralization of input during web page generation.
IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary JavaScript code due to improper neutralization of input during web page generation.
CVE-2026-81933High· 8.8IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2 is vulnerable to a SQL injection vulnerability in the Analytic Grid Service Handler
IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2 is vulnerable to a SQL injection vulnerability in the Analytic Grid Service Handler. A low-privileged authenticated user can inject SQL statements through the analytic cases grid endpoint, potentially re…
CVE-2026-81669High· 7.2IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2 is vulnerable to a command injection vulnerability in the create csr wildcard CLI command
IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2 is vulnerable to a command injection vulnerability in the create csr wildcard CLI command. An authenticated privileged CLI user can inject arbitrary shell commands through the alias input, resulting in c…
CVE-2026-82885High· 8.8IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to gain elevated privileges due to missing authorization in the REST API.
IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to gain elevated privileges due to missing authorization in the REST API.
CVE-2026-82832Critical· 9.6IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary code due to improper neutralization of input during web page generation.
IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary code due to improper neutralization of input during web page generation.
CVE-2026-82340Critical· 9.8IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2 is vulnerable to unauthenticated insecure deserialization and attacker-controlled reflective method dispatch in the Change Audit System (CAS) listener
IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2 is vulnerable to unauthenticated insecure deserialization and attacker-controlled reflective method dispatch in the Change Audit System (CAS) listener. A network attacker able to reach TCP port 16017 may…
CVE-2026-82896High· 7.6IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to traverse directories on the system due to a path traversal vulnerability.
IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to traverse directories on the system due to a path traversal vulnerability.
CVE-2026-82893High· 7.8IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2 could allow a local attacker to gain elevated privileges due to improper privilege management.
IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2 could allow a local attacker to gain elevated privileges due to improper privilege management.
CVE-2026-82892High· 8.1IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2 could allow a remote attacker to execute arbitrary commands due to improper neutralization of special elements used in an OS command.
IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2 could allow a remote attacker to execute arbitrary commands due to improper neutralization of special elements used in an OS command.
CVE-2026-84031Critical· 9.0IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary code due to improper neutralization of input during web page generation.
IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary code due to improper neutralization of input during web page generation.
CVE-2026-82967Critical· 9.8IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2 is vulnerable to an authentication bypass that allows an unauthenticated remote attacker to bypass IP-based access controls and access the Guardium management interface.
IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2 is vulnerable to an authentication bypass that allows an unauthenticated remote attacker to bypass IP-based access controls and access the Guardium management interface.
CVE-2026-84034High· 8.8IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2 is vulnerable to a hardcoded credentials vulnerability in the hardware_assess/obstore binaries
IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2 is vulnerable to a hardcoded credentials vulnerability in the hardware_assess/obstore binaries. A low-privileged authenticated user can recover hardcoded product master secrets, potentially resulting in …
CVE-2026-81626High· 8.6IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2 is vulnerable to a SQL injection vulnerability in the Load Balancer Groups component
IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2 is vulnerable to a SQL injection vulnerability in the Load Balancer Groups component. An unauthenticated user can inject SQL statements through the Load Balancer Servlet endpoint, potentially resulting i…
CVE-2026-84036High· 7.4IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to bypass security restrictions due to improper authorization.
IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to bypass security restrictions due to improper authorization.
CVE-2026-81937High· 7.2IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2 is vulnerable to a command injection vulnerability in the import remotelog_config file CLI command
IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2 is vulnerable to a command injection vulnerability in the import remotelog_config file CLI command. A highly privileged authenticated user can inject shell commands through the filename parameter, potent…
CVE-2026-18869Medium· 6.4IBM i 7.6, 7.5, 7.4, and 7.3 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to bypass security restrictions and access internal network services due to improper validation of FTP PORT and EPRT commands.
IBM i 7.6, 7.5, 7.4, and 7.3 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to bypass security restrictions and access internal network services due to improper validation of FTP PORT and EPRT commands.