IBM has 814 CVEs on record between 2024 and 2026. Disclosure cadence is accelerating: 667 in the last 90 days against 45 in the 90 before. The busiest recent month was September 2026 with 364. The median CVSS is 7.1 (high), with 84 rated critical. 0% have been exploited in the wild, in line with the corpus average. The dominant weakness classes are CWE-79 (53) and CWE-78 (52). Most affected products: guardium_data_protection (77), i (52), datastage_on_cloud_pak_for_data (51).
CVEs per month
Last 12 months, by publish date
- Exploited share
- 0% vs 1% corpus
- Median CVSS
- 7.1
- Publish → KEV
- —
- Last 90 days
- 667 prev 45
Weakness classes
Products
- guardium_data_protection 77
- i 52
- datastage_on_cloud_pak_for_data 51
- financial_transaction_manager 46
- datapower_gateway 42
- Langflow OSS 40
Worst active — by depth score
CVE-2026-107329Critical· 9.9Langflow OSS is affected by multiple vulnerabilities67CVE-2026-107328Critical· 9.9Langflow OSS is affected by multiple vulnerabilities67CVE-2026-107327Critical· 9.9Langflow OSS is affected by multiple vulnerabilities67CVE-2026-85542High· 8.8IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2 is affected by a command injection vulnerability in the GIM bundle import functionality67CVE-2026-93680Critical· 9.8Langflow OSS is affected by multiple vulnerabilities66
ibm vulnerabilities
CVEs affecting ibm, newest first. Open any entry for full detail, references, and exploit status.
814 CVEsRSS
CVE-2026-18066High· 7.9IBM Financial Transaction Manager (FTM) for RedHat OpenShift could allow a local attacker to obtain sensitive information and trigger unauthorized actions due to server-side request forgery.
IBM Financial Transaction Manager (FTM) for RedHat OpenShift could allow a local attacker to obtain sensitive information and trigger unauthorized actions due to server-side request forgery.
CVE-2026-18124Medium· 6.5IBM Financial Transaction Manager (FTM) for RedHat OpenShift could allow a local attacker to obtain sensitive information due to insufficiently protected credentials.
IBM Financial Transaction Manager (FTM) for RedHat OpenShift could allow a local attacker to obtain sensitive information due to insufficiently protected credentials.
CVE-2026-18123High· 7.6IBM Financial Transaction Manager (FTM) for RedHat OpenShift could allow a remote attacker to cause a denial of service due to the improper use of reflection with externally controlled input.
IBM Financial Transaction Manager (FTM) for RedHat OpenShift could allow a remote attacker to cause a denial of service due to the improper use of reflection with externally controlled input.
CVE-2026-18074High· 8.2IBM Financial Transaction Manager (FTM) for RedHat OpenShift could allow a remote attacker to perform unauthorized actions due to improper authentication and missing authorization.
IBM Financial Transaction Manager (FTM) for RedHat OpenShift could allow a remote attacker to perform unauthorized actions due to improper authentication and missing authorization.
CVE-2026-18132Medium· 6.5IBM Financial Transaction Manager (FTM) for RedHat OpenShift could allow a remote authenticated attacker to perform unauthorized payment mutation actions due to missing authorization.
IBM Financial Transaction Manager (FTM) for RedHat OpenShift could allow a remote authenticated attacker to perform unauthorized payment mutation actions due to missing authorization.
CVE-2026-18131High· 8.2IBM Financial Transaction Manager (FTM) for RedHat OpenShift could allow a remote attacker to execute arbitrary JavaScript in an authenticated user's browser due to improper neutralization of HTML input.
IBM Financial Transaction Manager (FTM) for RedHat OpenShift could allow a remote attacker to execute arbitrary JavaScript in an authenticated user's browser due to improper neutralization of HTML input.
CVE-2026-18133Medium· 5.4IBM Financial Transaction Manager (FTM) for RedHat OpenShift could allow a remote authenticated attacker to modify server files due to path traversal.
IBM Financial Transaction Manager (FTM) for RedHat OpenShift could allow a remote authenticated attacker to modify server files due to path traversal.
CVE-2026-84241High· 8.1IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2 could allow a remote attacker to bypass security restrictions due to improper authorization.
IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2 could allow a remote attacker to bypass security restrictions due to improper authorization.
CVE-2026-84239High· 7.6IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to improper neutralization of special elements used in an SQL command.
IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to improper neutralization of special elements used in an SQL command.
CVE-2026-84108High· 8.1IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2 could allow a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code due to improper neutralization of input during web page generation.
IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2 could allow a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code due to improper neutralization of input during web page generation.
CVE-2026-84106High· 8.9IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary code due to improper neutralization of input during web page generation.
IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary code due to improper neutralization of input during web page generation.
CVE-2026-84105High· 7.7IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to improper neutralization of special elements used in an SQL command.
IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to improper neutralization of special elements used in an SQL command.
CVE-2026-84089High· 7.8IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2 could allow a local attacker to gain elevated privileges due to improper privilege management.
IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2 could allow a local attacker to gain elevated privileges due to improper privilege management.
CVE-2026-84086High· 7.2IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary code due to improper limitation of a pathname to a restricted directory.
IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary code due to improper limitation of a pathname to a restricted directory.
CVE-2026-84085High· 8.1IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2 could allow a remote attacker to execute arbitrary OS commands due to improper neutralization of special elements used in an OS command.
IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2 could allow a remote attacker to execute arbitrary OS commands due to improper neutralization of special elements used in an OS command.
CVE-2026-84084High· 8.8IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2 could allow a remote attacker to bypass security restrictions due to a cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability.
IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2 could allow a remote attacker to bypass security restrictions due to a cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability.
CVE-2026-84083High· 7.8IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2 is vulnerable to local privilege escalation via the SUID-root nmap_wrapper binary on the Collector appliance
IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2 is vulnerable to local privilege escalation via the SUID-root nmap_wrapper binary on the Collector appliance. A local attacker with low-privileged access to the Collector can exploit insufficient argumen…
CVE-2026-84082Critical· 9.8IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2 could allow a remote attacker to execute arbitrary SQL commands due to improper neutralization of special elements used in an SQL command.
IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2 could allow a remote attacker to execute arbitrary SQL commands due to improper neutralization of special elements used in an SQL command.
CVE-2026-84081High· 8.1IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2 could allow a remote attacker to bypass security restrictions due to improper certificate validation.
IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2 could allow a remote attacker to bypass security restrictions due to improper certificate validation.
CVE-2026-84078Critical· 9.9IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2 is vulnerable to a missing authentication vulnerability in the LoadBalancerServlet
IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2 is vulnerable to a missing authentication vulnerability in the LoadBalancerServlet. An unauthenticated user can access privileged load-balancer operations, potentially resulting in unauthorized actions a…
CVE-2026-84077High· 8.1IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2 could allow a remote attacker to bypass security restrictions due to a cross-site request forgery vulnerability.
IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2 could allow a remote attacker to bypass security restrictions due to a cross-site request forgery vulnerability.
CVE-2026-84076High· 7.6IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to bypass security restrictions due to improper authorization.
IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to bypass security restrictions due to improper authorization.
CVE-2026-84075Critical· 9.9IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2 could allow a remote attacker to bypass security restrictions due to missing authentication for the ChangeTrackerServlet.
IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2 could allow a remote attacker to bypass security restrictions due to missing authentication for the ChangeTrackerServlet.
CVE-2026-84074High· 8.9IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary code due to improper neutralization of input during web page generation.
IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary code due to improper neutralization of input during web page generation.
CVE-2026-84073Critical· 9.1IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary SQL commands due to improper neutralization of special elements used in an SQL command.
IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary SQL commands due to improper neutralization of special elements used in an SQL command.
CVE-2026-11545Low· 3.7IBM WebSphere Application Server 8.5 and 9.0 could allow a remote attacker to obtain sensitive information from the administrative console due to missing authorization checks.
IBM WebSphere Application Server 8.5 and 9.0 could allow a remote attacker to obtain sensitive information from the administrative console due to missing authorization checks.
CVE-2026-11540Medium· 5.3IBM WebSphere Application Server 9.0 and 8.5 could allow a remote attacker to obtain sensitive information about the file system through the FileTransfer servlet.
IBM WebSphere Application Server 9.0 and 8.5 could allow a remote attacker to obtain sensitive information about the file system through the FileTransfer servlet.
CVE-2026-11539Medium· 5.3IBM WebSphere Application Server 9.0 and 8.5 is affected by an authentication bypass vulnerability in the SOAP/JMX connector.
IBM WebSphere Application Server 9.0 and 8.5 is affected by an authentication bypass vulnerability in the SOAP/JMX connector.
CVE-2026-11548Medium· 4.8IBM WebSphere Application Server and WebSphere Application Server Liberty are affected by an HTTP request smuggling vulnerability.
IBM WebSphere Application Server and WebSphere Application Server Liberty are affected by an HTTP request smuggling vulnerability.
CVE-2026-11711Medium· 6.5IBM WebSphere Application Server 9.0 and 8.5 is affected by a deserialization vulnerability in the Name Service component.
IBM WebSphere Application Server 9.0 and 8.5 is affected by a deserialization vulnerability in the Name Service component.